<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiplayer games for two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2006/02/multiplayer-games-for-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2006/02/multiplayer-games-for-two/</link>
	<description>Mikko Saari on board games.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikko Saari</title>
		<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2006/02/multiplayer-games-for-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikko Saari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vintagemahjong.com/gb/?p=3958#comment-2286</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree on San Juan (I really have no reason to try the two-player Puerto Rico variants because San Juan is so good with two, with fraction of the setup time Puerto Rico takes), but after my one experience with two-player Power Grid didn&#039;t leave me wanting for more.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree on San Juan (I really have no reason to try the two-player Puerto Rico variants because San Juan is so good with two, with fraction of the setup time Puerto Rico takes), but after my one experience with two-player Power Grid didn&#8217;t leave me wanting for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2006/02/multiplayer-games-for-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vintagemahjong.com/gb/?p=3958#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>San Juan works well with two, IMHO, and my husband and I are fond of playing Power Grid (Funkenschlag) one-on-one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Juan works well with two, IMHO, and my husband and I are fond of playing Power Grid (Funkenschlag) one-on-one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2006/02/multiplayer-games-for-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2284</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 00:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vintagemahjong.com/gb/?p=3958#comment-2284</guid>
		<description>Hansa works well for two.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hansa works well for two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young-Gun PARK</title>
		<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2006/02/multiplayer-games-for-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>Young-Gun PARK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vintagemahjong.com/gb/?p=3958#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>Age of Steam, The Princes of Florence and Puerto Rico are not bad to two players though they need some variants.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Age of Steam, The Princes of Florence and Puerto Rico are not bad to two players though they need some variants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Appelcline</title>
		<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2006/02/multiplayer-games-for-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Appelcline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 00:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vintagemahjong.com/gb/?p=3958#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>Samurai and Attika are two games that I actually prefer to play with two because I think they work best with that number.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samurai and Attika are two games that I actually prefer to play with two because I think they work best with that number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred</title>
		<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2006/02/multiplayer-games-for-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 00:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vintagemahjong.com/gb/?p=3958#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>Other two-player multiplayer games I like, anyway:
Goa is probably one of the few auction games (I can think of) that works well two-player.  I probably prefer Java and Tikal two-player, if only to reduce downtime.
Einfach Genial&#039;s a great two-player game, but I think the partnership game is the way to go, personally.  (Thereby agreeing that the two-sided dynamic is best.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other two-player multiplayer games I like, anyway:<br />
Goa is probably one of the few auction games (I can think of) that works well two-player.  I probably prefer Java and Tikal two-player, if only to reduce downtime.<br />
Einfach Genial&#8217;s a great two-player game, but I think the partnership game is the way to go, personally.  (Thereby agreeing that the two-sided dynamic is best.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

