<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday session: Preference, Metropolys, Tarok, Dolmengötter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2008/07/thursday-session-preference-metropolys-tarok-dolmengotter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2008/07/thursday-session-preference-metropolys-tarok-dolmengotter/</link>
	<description>Mikko Saari on board games.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikko</title>
		<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2008/07/thursday-session-preference-metropolys-tarok-dolmengotter/comment-page-1/#comment-2587</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vintagemahjong.com/gb/?p=4268#comment-2587</guid>
		<description>Hard to say after just one game, but if you feel that way, then yes, probably you&#039;ll have a problem there. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s such a huge deal. Yes, the board is the same, but player-created chaos should make every game different enough.
I&#039;ve now played nine games of Die Dolmengötter — there too the board is static and players have the same pieces. There aren&#039;t even any secret objective cards... yet I find it immensely replayable and haven&#039;t found it at all boring or repetitious.
My current feeling is that Metropolys is quick enough to shine, that&#039;s the key. I think it might be possible to play the game in 30 minutes, which would be pretty sweet.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to say after just one game, but if you feel that way, then yes, probably you&#8217;ll have a problem there. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s such a huge deal. Yes, the board is the same, but player-created chaos should make every game different enough.<br />
I&#8217;ve now played nine games of Die Dolmengötter — there too the board is static and players have the same pieces. There aren&#8217;t even any secret objective cards&#8230; yet I find it immensely replayable and haven&#8217;t found it at all boring or repetitious.<br />
My current feeling is that Metropolys is quick enough to shine, that&#8217;s the key. I think it might be possible to play the game in 30 minutes, which would be pretty sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.mikkosgameblog.com/2008/07/thursday-session-preference-metropolys-tarok-dolmengotter/comment-page-1/#comment-2586</link>
		<dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vintagemahjong.com/gb/?p=4268#comment-2586</guid>
		<description>I considered buying Metropolys, but concluded that the replayability was too low since the board is static and players have the same bidding pieces.  I don&#039;t think the secret objective cards would vary things enough for me.
Do you agree or do you think the replayability is really high?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I considered buying Metropolys, but concluded that the replayability was too low since the board is static and players have the same bidding pieces.  I don&#8217;t think the secret objective cards would vary things enough for me.<br />
Do you agree or do you think the replayability is really high?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

